2026 Edition · Available Now
Consensus rankings for the 2026 season from 4 expert sources, calibrated for PPR, Half-PPR, and Standard scoring. Available now.
Instant download · No account required
Mark a pick and the kit tells you on the spot whether it was a bargain or a reach, measured against your Gambitry consensus. During the draft when it's still a decision you can make.
It opens at the kitchen table as cleanly as it opens online. Basement draft with two bars of signal and a paper board? The kit doesn't notice. Portability is the point.
Stuck between similar players? Pull up players side by side and compare them on Gambitry's Top-300 rank and ADP, where the difference actually lives.
A dedicated draft tracker for every league you're in. Each with its own settings, board, and draft results. Run all four the same weekend without a single number bleeding into another.
Every rule that quietly wins drafts — kicker last, ceiling over floor, best available over need — each with the one-sentence reason it holds. The board gives you names; the Survival Guide gives you discipline.
A complete fantasy draft kit built as an interactive spreadsheet you can bring to your live draft.
Illustrative mockup · Real product screenshots at launch
Full consensus rankings for QB, RB, WR, TE, K, and DEF. Each ranking synthesizes four expert sources across three analytical traditions: consensus aggregation, major platform intelligence, and independent editorial authority.
Three separate ranking sets, each built from format-specific source data. A running back's value in PPR is different than in Standard and your draft board should reflect that.
Mark picks as they happen and the tracker surfaces remaining value in real time. Works at your live draft with no WiFi. Just the spreadsheet open on your laptop.
Tiebreaker logic and draft-day decision rules. Most draft tools give you a list. This kit gives you a framework for what to do when the board doesn't go as planned.
Every ranking in the kit is built from four expert sources representing three distinct methodological traditions — consensus aggregation, platform intelligence, and editorial journalism. Equal-weight consensus.
Read the full curation methodology →Draft well.